Our Kansas City Law Firm Has You Covered

816-839-5150

Home » Blog » Mass Torts vs. Class Actions: What Is the Difference?

On This Page


Mass Torts vs. Class Actions: What Is the Difference?

different over-the-counter medications in their packaging

Many people assume that mass tort litigation is the same thing as a class action lawsuit. This is one of the most common misconceptions about mass torts. While the two types of cases may appear similar, they are fundamentally different.

Understanding that distinction is important because it affects how cases are investigated, litigated, and ultimately resolved. The team at CPY Law explains what a class action is, what a mass tort is, how these kinds of legal actions differ, and the advantages that mass torts have over class actions.

If you’ve been harmed by a product and need to speak with a mass tort lawyer about pursuing compensation, contact our Kansas City law firm today. We’ll handle the fight so you can focus on healing.

Key Takeaways:
  • A class action lawsuit is when one or more people sue on behalf of a larger group against the same defendant. This class shares similar legal claims, and eligible class members divide compensation from a settlement fund.
  • A mass tort also involves multiple plaintiffs with coordinated discovery, expert development, and pretrial proceedings. However, each claim is considered individually based on the severity of injuries and financial losses experienced.
  • Since mass torts consider individual experiences, compensation often differs from person to person.

What Is a Class Action Lawsuit?

In a class action, one or more individuals file a lawsuit on behalf of a much larger group of people who have suffered similar injuries or financial losses. 

Instead of individual claims, the court certifies a “class” of individuals whose claims are considered sufficiently similar to be resolved together. If the class is certified, the lawsuit generally proceeds as one case.

The outcome of a class action, whether by settlement or trial, typically applies to everyone who remains a member of the class.

When Are Class Action Lawsuits Appropriate?

Class actions are often appropriate when the damages suffered by each individual are relatively modest and the primary issues are nearly identical.

Examples may include:

  • Consumer protection claims
  • Data breaches
  • Unlawful fees
  • Defective products that caused primarily economic losses rather than significant physical injuries

What Is Mass Tort Litigation?

A mass tort also involves many people who have been harmed by the same product or event. However, the similarities to class action lawsuits often end there.

Each individual may have:

  • Different medical conditions
  • Different levels of exposure
  • Different treatment histories
  • Different long-term complications
  • Different financial losses
  • Different pain and suffering

In a mass tort, every plaintiff maintains an individual lawsuit given the unique circumstances they’ve experienced.

The Value of Each Claim Is Considered Individually

Although common legal and scientific issues may be addressed together, each person’s damages in a mass tort are evaluated separately. The value of one person’s claim does not automatically determine the value of another person’s claim.

This individualized approach is one reason mass tort litigation has become the preferred method for many cases involving dangerous pharmaceuticals, defective medical devices, and toxic exposure.

Does Every Mass Tort Become a Class Action?

No. In fact, most major pharmaceutical and medical device cases proceed as mass torts rather than class actions.

Courts generally recognize that physical injuries vary too significantly from one person to another to permit fair treatment through a single class-wide proceeding. Instead, plaintiffs pursue individual claims while benefiting from coordinated discovery, expert development, and pretrial proceedings.

That combination of efficiency and individualized justice is one of the defining features of modern mass tort litigation.

concerned woman on the phone with her lawyer about injury

Why Individual Cases in a Mass Tort Matter

Imagine two people who took the same prescription medication.

  • The first person experienced temporary gastrointestinal symptoms that resolved after stopping the medication.
  • The second person required multiple surgeries, developed permanent complications, missed months of work, and will require future medical care.

Even though both individuals took the same drug, their injuries and the impact those injuries have had on their lives are dramatically different. Treating those two claims as if they were identical would not produce a fair result.

Mass tort litigation recognizes these differences by allowing each plaintiff to pursue compensation based on his or her own circumstances while still benefiting from coordinated litigation on issues common to all cases.

Why Do Courts Coordinate Mass Tort Cases?

If thousands of people file product liability lawsuits involving the same medication or medical device, many of the legal questions will overlap.

For example, every plaintiff may need to establish:

  • How the product was designed
  • What safety testing was performed before it reached the market
  • What the product’s manufacturer knew about potential risks
  • Whether appropriate warnings were provided with the product
  • Whether alternative product designs or additional warnings could have reduced the risk of injury

Without coordination, these same issues would have to be litigated repeatedly in courts across the country. To promote efficiency and consistency, courts often consolidate portions of these cases while preserving each plaintiff’s individual lawsuit.

What Are the Advantages of Mass Tort Litigation Over Class Actions?

Mass tort litigation offers several important benefits for injured individuals throughout Kansas City.

More Efficient Discovery

Complex product liability cases often require millions of pages of corporate documents, internal emails, scientific studies, regulatory filings, and expert testimony.

Rather than requiring every plaintiff to obtain this information independently, much of the discovery process can be conducted once for the benefit of all participating cases. This significantly reduces duplication while allowing attorneys to focus on the unique aspects of each client’s claim.

Consistent Resolution of Common Issues

Mass tort litigation also promotes greater consistency in how courts resolve recurring legal questions.

Although judges may reach different conclusions on individual issues, coordinated proceedings reduce the likelihood that identical questions will be answered differently in hundreds of separate courtrooms.

Individualized Compensation for Each Claim

Perhaps the greatest advantage of a mass tort is that each plaintiff’s damages remain personal. Compensation may depend on numerous factors, including:

  • The severity of the injury
  • The type and duration of medical treatment
  • Whether surgery was required
  • Permanent disability or impairment
  • Lost wages and diminished earning capacity
  • Future medical expenses
  • Pain, suffering, and reduced quality of life

Because no two individuals experience an injury in exactly the same way, mass tort litigation allows each claim to be evaluated on its own merits. In that way, you can receive fair, individualized compensation rather than a single set amount.

Injured by a Product? Contact a Kansas City Mass Tort Lawyer

If you’ve been injured by a dangerous drug, hurt because of a defective medical device, or got into a crash because of defective tires or auto parts, CPY Law is here to help. We’ll determine if you have a claim and help you seek compensation that reflects your injuries.

For a free consultation, contact our Kansas City law firm today. You focus on healing while we handle the fight.